X.
HEALTHFUL DRINKS.
THERE is no direction in which a woman more needs both scientific
knowledge and moral force than in using her influence to control her
family in regard to stimulating beverages.
It is a point fully established by experience that the full
development of the human body and the vigorous exercise of all its
functions can be secured without the use of stimulating drinks. It is,
therefore, perfectly safe to bring up children never to use them, no
hazard being incurred by such a course.
It is also found by experience that there are two evils incurred by
the use of stimulating drinks. The first is, their positive effect on
the human system. Their peculiarity consists in so exciting the nervous
system that all the functions of the body are accelerated, and the
fluids are caused to move quicker than at their natural speed. This
increased motion of the animal fluids always produces an agreeable
effect on the mind. The intellect is invigorated, the imagination is
excited, the spirits are enlivened; and these effects are so agreeable
that all mankind, after having once experienced them, feel a great
desire for their repetition.
But this temporary invigoration of the system is always followed by
a diminution of the powers of the stimulated organs; so that, though in
all cases this reaction may not be perceptible, it is invariably the
result. It may be set down as the unchangeable rule of physiology, that
stimulating drinks deduct from the powers of the constitution in exactly
the proportion in which they operate to produce temporary invigoration.
The second evil is the temptation which always attends the use of
stimulants. Their effect on the system is so agreeable, and the evils
resulting are so imperceptible and distant, that there is a constant
tendency to increase such excitement both in frequency and power. And
the more the system is thus reduced in strength, the more craving is the
desire for that which imparts a temporary invigoration. This process of
increasing debility and increasing craving for the stimulus that removes
it, often goes to such an extreme that the passion is perfectly
uncontrollable, and mind and body perish under this baleful habit.
In this country there are three forms in which the use of such
stimulants is common; namely, alcoholic
drinks, opium mixtures,
and tobacco. These are all alike
in the main peculiarity of imparting that extra stimulus to the system
which tends to exhaust its powers.
Multitudes in this nation are in the habitual use of some one of
these stimulants; and each person defends the indulgence by certain
arguments:
First, that the desire for stimulants is a natural propensity
implanted in man's nature, as is manifest from the universal tendency to
such indulgences in every nation. From this, it is inferred that it is
an innocent desire, which ought to be gratified to some extent, and that
the aim should be to keep it within the limits of temperance, instead of
attempting to exterminate a natural propensity.
This is an argument which, if true, makes it equally proper for not
only men, but women and children, to use opium, brandy, or tobacco as
stimulating principles, provided they are used temperately. But if it be
granted that perfect health and strength can be gained and secured
without these stimulants, and that their peculiar effect is to diminish
the power of the system in exactly the same proportion as they stimulate
it, then there is no such thing as a temperate use,
unless they are so diluted as to destroy any stimulating power; and in
this form they are seldom desired.
The other argument for their use is, that they are among the good
things provided by the Creator for our gratification; that, like all
other blessings, they are exposed to abuse and excess; and that we
should rather seek to regulate their use than to banish them entirely.
This argument is based on the assumption that they are, like
healthful foods and drinks, necessary to life and health, and injurious
only by excess. But this is not true; for whenever they are used in any
such strength as to be a gratification, they operate to a greater or
less extent as stimulants; and to just such extent they wear out the
powers of the constitution; and it is abundantly proved that they are
not, like food and drink, necessary to health. Such articles are
designed for medicine and not for common use. There can be no argument
framed to defend the use of one of them which will not justify women and
children in most dangerous indulgences.
There are some facts recently revealed by the microscope in regard
to alcoholic drinks, which every woman should understand and regard. It
has been shown in a previous chapter that every act of mind, either by
thought, feeling, or choice, causes the destruction of certain cells in
the brain and nerves. It now is proved by microscopic science*
that the kind of nutrition furnished to the brain by the blood to a
certain extent decides future feelings, thoughts, and volitions. The
cells of the brain not only abstract from the blood the healthful
nutrition, but also are affected in shape, size, color, and action by
unsuitable elements in the blood. This is especially the case when
alcohol is taken into the stomach, from whence it is always carried to
the brain. The consequence is, that it affects the nature and action of
the
brain-cells, until a habit is formed which is
automatic; that is, the mind
loses the power of controlling the brain in its development of thoughts,
feelings, and choices as it would in the natural state, and is itself
controlled by the brain. In this condition a real disease of the brain
is created, called oino-mania,
(see Glossary,) and the only
remedy is total abstinence, and that for a long period, from the
alcoholic poison. And what makes the danger more fearful is, that the
brain-cells never are so renewed but that this pernicious stimulus will
bring back the disease in full force, so that a man once subject to it
is never safe except by maintaining perpetual and total abstinence from
every kind of alcoholic drink. Dr. Day, who for many years has had
charge of an inebriate asylum, states that he witnessed the dissection
of the brain of a man once an inebriate, but for many years in practice
of total abstinence, and found its cells still in the weak and unnatural
state produced by earlier indulgences.
* For these statements the writer is indebted to Maudsley, a recent
writer on Microscopic Physiology.
There has unfortunately been a difference of opinion among medical
men as to the use of alcohol. Liebig, the celebrated writer on animal
chemistry, having found that both sugar and alcohol were heat-producing
articles of food, framed a theory that alcohol is burnt in the lungs,
giving off carbonic acid and water, and thus serving to warm the body.
But modern science has proved that it is in the capillaries that animal
heat is generated, and it is believed that alcohol lessens instead of
increasing the power of the body to bear the cold. Sir John Ross, in his
Arctic voyage, proved by his own experience and that of his men that
cold-water drinkers could bear cold longer and were stronger than any
who used alcohol.
Carpenter, a standard writer on physiology, says the objection to a
habitual use of even small quantities of alcoholic drinks is, that "they
are universally admitted to possess a poisonous character," and "tend to
produce a morbid condition of body;" while "the capacity for enduring
extremes
of heat and cold, or of mental or bodily labor, is diminished rather
than increased by their habitual employment."
Prof. J. Bigelow, of Harvard University, says, "Alcohol is highly
stimulating, heating, and intoxicating, and its effects are so
fascinating that when once experienced there is danger that the desire
for them may be perpetuated."
Dr. Bell and Dr. Churchill, both high medical authorities,
especially in lung disease, for which whisky is often recommended, come
to the conclusion that "the opinion that alcoholic liquors have
influence in preventing the deposition of tubercle is destitute of any
foundation; on the contrary, their use predisposes to tubercular
deposition." And "where tubercle exists, alcohol has no effect in
modifying the usual course, neither does it modify the morbid effects on
the system."
Prof. Youmans, of New-York, says: "It has been demonstrated that
alcoholic drinks prevent the natural changes in the blood, and obstruct
the nutritive and reparative functions." He adds, "Chemical experiments
have demonstrated that the action of alcohol on the digestive fluid is
to destroy its active principle, the
pepsin, thus confirming the observations of physiologists, that
its use gives rise to serious disorders of the stomach and malignant
aberration of the whole economy."
We are now prepared to consider the great principles of science,
common sense, and religion, which should guide every woman who has any
kind of influence or responsibility on this subject.
It is allowed by all medical men that pure water is perfectly
healthful and supplies all the liquid needed by the body; and also that
by proper means, which ordinarily are in the reach of all, water can be
made sufficiently pure.
It is allowed by all that milk, and the juices of fruits, when taken
into the stomach, furnish water that is always pure, and that our bread
and vegetable food also supply it in large quantities. There are besides
a great variety of
agreeable and healthful beverages, made from the juices of fruit,
containing no alcohol, and agreeable drinks, such as milk, cocoa, and
chocolate, that contain no stimulating principles, and which are
nourishing and healthful.
As one course, then, is perfectly safe and another involves great
danger, it is wrong and sinful to choose the path of danger. There is no
peril in drinking pure water, milk, the juices of fruits, and infusions
that are nourishing and harmless. But there is great danger to the
young, and to the commonwealth, in patronizing the sale and use of
alcoholic drinks. The religion of Christ, in its distinctive feature,
involves generous self-denial for the good of others, especially for the
weaker members of society. It is on this principle that St. Paul sets
forth his own example, "If meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no
flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend." And
again he teaches, "We, then, that are strong ought to bear the
infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves."
This Christian principle also applies to the common drinks of the
family, tea and coffee.
It has been shown that the great end for which Jesus Christ came,
and for which he instituted the family state, is the training of our
whole race to virtue and happiness, with chief reference to an immortal
existence. In this mission, of which woman is chief minister, as before
stated, the distinctive feature is self-sacrifice of the wiser and
stronger members to save and to elevate the weaker ones. The children
and the servants are these weaker members, who by ignorance and want of
habits of self-control are in most danger. It is in this aspect that we
are to consider the expediency of using tea and coffee in a family.
These drinks are a most extensive cause of much of the nervous
debility and suffering endured by American women; and relinquishing them
would save an immense amount of such suffering. Moreover, all
housekeepers will allow that
they can not regulate these drinks in their kitchens, where the ignorant
use them to excess. There is little probability that the present
generation will make so decided a change in their habits as to give up
these beverages; but the subject is presented rather in reference to
forming the habits of children.
It is a fact that tea and coffee are at first seldom or never
agreeable to children. It is the mixture of milk, sugar, and water, that
reconciles them to a taste, which in this manner gradually becomes
agreeable. Now suppose that those who provide for a family conclude that
it is not their duty to give up
entirely the use of stimulating drinks, may not the case appear
different in regard to teaching their children to love such drinks? Let
the matter be regarded thus: The experiments of physiologists all prove
that stimulants are not needful to health, and that, as the general
rule, they tend to debilitate the constitution. Is it right, then, for a
parent to tempt a child to drink what is not needful, when there is a
probability that it will prove, to some extent, an undermining drain on
the constitution? Some constitutions can bear much less excitement than
others; and in every family of children, there is usually one or more of
delicate organization, and consequently peculiarly exposed to dangers
from this source. It is this child who ordinarily becomes the victim to
stimulating drinks. The tea and coffee which the parents and the
healthier children can use without immediate injury, gradually sap the
energies of the feebler child, who proves either an early victim or a
living martyr to all the sufferings that debilitated nerves inflict. Can
it be right to lead children where all allow that there is some danger,
and where in many cases disease and death are met, when another path is
known to be perfectly safe?
The impression common in this country, that
warm drinks, especially in
winter, are more healthful than cold, is not warranted by any
experience, nor by the laws of the physical system. At dinner, cold
drinks are universal, and no one
deems them injurious. It is only at the other two meals that they are
supposed to be hurtful.
There is no doubt that warm
drinks are healthful, and more agreeable than cold, at certain times and
seasons; but it is equally true that drinks above blood-heat are not
healthful. If a person should bathe in warm water every day, debility
would inevitably follow; for the frequent application of the stimulus of
heat, like all other stimulants, eventually causes relaxation and
weakness. If, therefore, a person is in the habit of drinking hot drinks
twice a day, the teeth, throat, and stomach are gradually debilitated.
This, most probably, is one of the causes of an early decay of the
teeth, which is observed to be much more common among American ladies,
than among those in European countries.
It has been stated to the writer, by an intelligent traveler who had
visited Mexico, that it was rare to meet an individual with even a
tolerable set of teeth, and that almost every grown person he met in the
street had merely remnants of teeth. On inquiry into the customs of the
country, it was found that it was the universal practice to take their
usual beverage at almost the boiling-point; and this doubtless was the
chief cause of the almost entire want of teeth in that country. In the
United States, it can not be doubted that much evil is done in this way
by hot drinks. Most tea-drinkers consider tea as ruined if it stands
until it reaches the healthful temperature for drink.
The following extract, from Dr. Andrew Combe, presents the opinion
of most intelligent medical men on this subject.*
* The writer would here remark, in reference to extracts made from
various authors, that, for the sake of abridging, she has often left out
parts of a paragraph, but never so as to modify the meaning of the
author. Some ideas, not connected with the subject in hand, are omitted,
but none are altered.
"Water is a safe drink for
all constitutions, provided it be resorted to in obedience to the
dictates of natural thirst
only, and not of habit. Unless the desire for it is felt, there is no
occasion for its use during a meal."
"The primary effect of all distilled and fermented liquors is to
stimulate the nervous system and
quicken the circulation. In infancy and childhood, the
circulation is rapid and easily excited; and the nervous system is
strongly acted upon even by the slightest external impressions. Hence,
slight causes of irritation readily excite febrile and convulsive
disorders. In youth, the natural tendency of the constitution is still
to excitement, and consequently, as a general rule, the stimulus of
fermented liquors is injurious."
These remarks show that parents, who find that stimulating drinks
are not injurious to themselves, may mistake in inferring from this that
they will not be injurious to their children.
Dr. Combe continues thus: "In mature age, when digestion is good,
and the system in full vigor, if the mode of life be not too exhausting,
the nervous functions and general circulation are in their best
condition, and require no stimulus for their support. The bodily energy
is then easily sustained by nutritious food and a regular regimen, and
consequently artificial excitement only increases the wasting of the
natural strength."
It may be asked, in this connection, why the stimulus of animal food
is not to be regarded in the same light as that of stimulating drinks.
In reply, a very essential difference may be pointed out. Animal food
furnishes nutriment to the organs which it stimulates, but stimulating
drinks excite the organs to quickened action without affording any
nourishment.
It has been supposed by some that tea and coffee have, at least, a
degree of nourishing power. But it is proved that it is the milk and
sugar, and not the main portion of the drink, which imparts the
nourishment. Tea has not one particle of nourishing properties; and what
little exists in the coffee-berry is lost by roasting it in the usual
mode. All
that these articles do, is simply to
stimulate without nourishing.
Although there is little hope of banishing these drinks, there is
still a chance that something may be gained in attempts to regulate
their use by the rules of temperance. If, then, a housekeeper can not
banish tea and coffee entirely, she may use her influence to prevent
excess, both by her instructions, and by the power of control committed
more or less to her hands.
It is important for every housekeeper to know that the health of a
family very much depends on the purity
of water used for cooking and drinking. There are three causes of impure
and unhealthful water. One is, the existence in it of vegetable or
animal matter, which can be remedied by filtering through sand and
charcoal. Another cause is, the existence of mineral matter, especially
in limestone countries, producing diseases of the bladder. This is
remedied in a measure by boiling, which secures a deposit of the lime on
the vessel used. The third cause is, the corroding of zinc and lead used
in pipes and reservoirs, producing oxides that are slow poisons. The
only remedy is prevention, by having supply-pipes made of iron, like
gas-pipe, instead of zinc or lead; or the lately invented lead pipe
lined with tin, which metal is not corrosive. The obstacle to this is,
that the trade of the plumbers would be greatly diminished by the use of
reliable pipes. When water must be used from supply-pipes of lead or
zinc, it is well to let the water run some time before drinking it and
to use as little as possible, taking milk instead; and being further
satisfied for inner necessities by the water supplied by fruits and
vegetables. The water in these is always pure. But in using milk as a
drink, it must be remembered that it is also rich food, and that less of
other food must be taken when milk is thus used, or bilious troubles
will result from excess of food.
The use of opium, especially by women, is usually caused at first by
medical prescriptions containing it. All that has
been stated as to the effect of alcohol in the brain is true of opium;
while, to break a habit thus induced is almost hopeless. Every woman who
takes or who administers this drug, is dealing as with poisoned arrows,
whose wounds are without cure.
The use of tobacco in this country, and especially among young boys,
is increasing at a fearful rate. On this subject, we have the unanimous
opinion of all medical men; the following being specimens.
A distinguished medical writer thus states the case: "Every
physician knows that the argreeable sensations that tempt to the use of
tobacco are caused by nicotine,
which is a rank poison, as much so as prussic acid or arsenic. When
smoked, the poison is absorbed by the blood of the mouth, and carried to
the brain. When chewed, the nicotine passes to the blood through the
mouth and stomach. In both cases, the whole nervous system is thrown
into abnormal excitement to expel the poison, and it is this excitement
that causes agreeable sensations. The excitement thus caused is
invariably followed by a diminution of nervous power, in exact
proportion to the preceding excitement to expel the evil from the
system."
Few will dispute the general truth and effect of the above
statement, so that the question is one to be settled on the same
principle as applies to the use of alcoholic drinks. Is it, then,
according to the generous principles of Christ's religion, for those who
are strong and able to bear this poison, to tempt the young, the
ignorant, and the weak to a practice not needful to any healthful
enjoyment, and which leads multitudes to disease, and often to vice? For
the use of tobacco tends always to lessen nerve-power, and probably
every one out of five that indulges in its use awakens a morbid craving
for increased stimulus, lessens the power of self-control, diminishes
the strength of the constitution, and sets an example that influences
the weak to the path of danger and of frequent ruin.
The great danger of this age is an increasing, intense
worldliness, and disbelief in the foundation principle of the religion
of Christ, that we are to reap through everlasting ages the consequences
of habits formed in this life. In the light of his word, they only who
are truly wise "shall shine as the firmament, and they that turn many to
righteousness, as the stars, forever and ever."
It is increased faith or
belief in the teachings of
Christ's religion, as to the influence of this life upon the
life to come, which alone can
save our country and the world from that inrushing tide of sensualism
and worldliness, now seeming to threaten the best hopes and prospects of
our race.
And woman, as the chief educator of our race, and the prime minister
of the family state, is bound in the use of meats and drinks to employ
the powerful and distinctive motives of the religion of Christ in
forming habits of temperance and benevolent self-sacrifice for the good
of others.
|